Imagine immersing yourself in a virtual reality world where vibrant colors and deep blacks should deliver the ultimate visual experience. Yet Meta's Quest 2 and Quest 3 headsets opt for LCD screens instead of OLED displays known for superior color performance. The decision stems from more than just cost considerations—it's a careful balance of multiple technical factors.

While OLED screens excel in contrast ratio and color accuracy, they present inherent challenges for VR applications. One significant issue is the "screen door effect" (SDE), where visible gaps between pixels become apparent when viewed at close range, diminishing immersion. Additionally, OLED displays can exhibit motion blur in low persistence mode, particularly during fast-moving scenes, despite their fast pixel response times.

LCD technology offers several benefits for VR headsets. The higher pixel density of LCD panels effectively reduces the screen door effect, creating a more seamless visual experience. LCD screens also achieve higher brightness levels, making them more suitable for use in well-lit environments.

Though LCDs traditionally lag behind OLED in contrast performance, advancements like Mini-LED backlight technology have significantly improved color reproduction and contrast ratios. The cost efficiency of LCD production also contributes to more affordable VR hardware without compromising essential performance metrics.

Display technology continues to evolve rapidly. Future VR devices may revisit OLED implementations as solutions emerge for current limitations. Potential improvements include higher resolution displays, advanced pixel arrangements, optimized driving circuits to minimize SDE and motion blur, plus new materials and manufacturing techniques to extend OLED lifespan.

The choice between display technologies for VR hardware will ultimately depend on the evolving balance between technological advancements and market demands, with each solution offering distinct advantages for different use cases and user priorities.